BPC-157
The most-searched non-GLP-1 peptide — search interest rose roughly 12x from 2023 to 2026 — and the central case in the 2026 compounding-reclassification news. Widely promoted for injury recovery despite thin evidence.
Animal-heavy; only ~3 tiny uncontrolled human studies (~28 subjects total); no RCTs. 2025 review: 'should not be recommended for clinical use.' Headline efficacy figures are marketing.
- Active/prior cancer (pro-angiogenic; precautionary)
- Pregnancyhard stop
- WADA-tested athletes/military
- Anticoagulant users (uncharacterized - clinician oversight)
- Anticoagulants - direction uncertain (rat data REDUCED bleeding; do not assert either way)
- Unknown long-term safety
- Theoretical angiogenesis/cancer concern
- Anecdotal anxiety/anhedonia reports (STAT, Feb 2026)
The primary sources behind this monograph — each opens the registry so you can verify the claim yourself. Last verified 2026-06-13.
Peer-reviewedCurrent Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 2025Evidence — peer-reviewed studyHow we source & verify — the full method →Beyond these primaries, every monograph is distilled from TrackurStack’s research dossier — 584 de-duplicated sources across 4 research iterations, adversarially verified against primary sources.